Facebook Alphabet and Twitter CEOs face US Congress
The CEO of Facebook appeared before the House of Representatives committee Thursday, where he suggested a way to amend Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act.
Platform accused of not handling fake news
“The principles of Section 230 are still relevant today, as they were in 1996, but the Internet has changed dramatically,” said Mark Zucker, a subcommittee of the Energy and Trade Committee of the House of Representatives. Berg said in his speech. He appeared before the subcommittee along with Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet, and Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter.
From the start, lawmakers have expressed anger at social media executives who have been unable to curb disinformation on the platform. In particular, they blamed the spread of false information about the Covid-19 vaccine, as well as false information and a hate message that led to an attempted riot on Capitol Hill in January.
“You have the means to stop the disinformation. But every time, we choose the implication and the interests rather than the healthy public discourse and the health and the public safety”, accuses Mike Doyle (D-PA), president of the Communications and Technology Subcommittee. “We are going to legislate to end this situation.”
Take protective measures to combat illegal content
Parliamentarians have been discussing for some time amendments to Article 230 of the Communication Decency Law, which is part of the Telecommunications Law of 1996. This law exempts online platforms from any liability for content. . Posted by a third party.
Mark Zuckerberg proposes to change the law in a way that closely matches existing Facebook practices. From this content, he defends himself. “Instead of being rejected, the platform must demonstrate that it has a system to identify and remove illegal content. If no specific content is detected, the platform will not be responsible. This is impractical on platforms that publish billions of messages. day, but you need to have the right system in place to handle illegal content.
The CEO of Facebook suggests that the definition of a suitable system is proportional to the size of the platform and can be defined by a third party. He adds that “best practices” should not include irrelevant issues that deserve sufficient discussion, such as encryption and privacy.
Meanwhile, Sundar Pichai said: “Recently proposed changes to section 230. Unexpected results can occur. It undermines both freedom of expression and the platform’s ability to act responsibly to protect its users in the face of ever-changing challenges. “
Instead, the industry should focus on “the process of dealing with harmful content and behavior,” he adds. The solution was designed to develop clear and accessible content policies, notify users when content is removed, enable users to challenge content decisions, and manage harmful content. This involves sharing the functioning of the system over time.
Jack Dorsey did not mention section 230 in his speech. He preferred to propose principles that social platforms could adhere to, such as “selection of algorithms”.
“We believe that individuals should have transparency or meaningful control over the algorithms that affect them,” he says. “We recognize that there is much more we can do to.
If instead we woke up tomorrow and decided to ask the government to tell us what content to take down or leave up, we may end up with a service that couldn’t be used to question the government. This is a reality in many countries today, and is against the rights of an individual.
— jack (@jack) March 25, 2021
Facebook Alphabet and Twitter CEOs face US Congress - /10